Today's Guest Author: Stephen Vrla
Stephen is a PhD student at Michigan
State University, where he studies sociology, animal studies, and environmental
science and policy. His research focuses on how educational institutions
affect children's attitudes toward animals and the environment. He also
helps facilitate the high school religious education group at the Unitarian
Universalist Church of Greater Lansing in East Lansing, MI.
Sermon
Delivered 4/27/2014 at the Unitarian Universalist Church of
Greater Lansing
East Lansing, MI
To listen to the sermon (and all the responses) click here.
Hi! For those of you who don’t already know me, my name is
Stephen Vrla. I moved to East Lansing last summer to start graduate school at
MSU, and I’ve been coming to UUCGL ever since. As the Young Adult Group was
planning this Earth Day service, I volunteered to reflect on my experience with
Unitarian Universalism and offer my thoughts on its connection to non- human
animals and the environment. However, we all agreed that we really want to hear
your experiences and thoughts, too. For that reason, we’ve decided to make this
an interactive reflection. Throughout it, I’ll ask you questions and encourage
you to text in your responses. So if you tucked your phone away or turned it
off before the service—thanks for doing that, by the way—please go ahead and take it out. Some of your
responses will be displayed on the screen, and we’ll have time to read through
them before I give my own response. We’ll also have time for you to call out
your responses in case you don’t have a phone with you or would prefer not to text
in. To get started, please think about the following question, and, if you’re
interested, text in the code on the screen, followed by your response, to the
number on the screen: In a word or two, describe the feeling you had when you
first discovered Unitarian Universalism. (Read some of the responses out loud.)
Now, if you would like to call out a response, please do so. (Repeat responses
as they’re called out.)
I first discovered Unitarian Universalism was two and a
half years ago at the First Unitarian Universalist Church of Houston, Texas.
Although I remember being enthusiastically greeted by a member of the welcome
team, my most distinct memory is of what I saw when I entered the sanctuary:
whereas the Lutheran church I grew up in had an imposing, wooden cross hanging
above its altar, this church had an delicate, metal sculpture of a flock of
seabirds flying over its pulpit. Before the minister had spoken a word, I knew
this church was different from any other church I had been to, and it was this difference
that brought me back the following Sunday, and almost every subsequent Sunday
for the rest of the year. Now, to be fair, I later learned that the seabird
sculpture was pretty controversial at First UU. Some members of the
congregation loved it, but others hated it, and one of the ministers not-so-lovingly admitted that, when he delivered
sermons, he felt that he belonged on the poster of Alfred Hitchcock’s film The Birds.
So, maybe I shouldn’t have based my first impression of the church on the sculpture.
Still, I believed at the time, and continue to believe now, that a church that
values animals and the environment enough to put a representation of them in so
prominent a position warrants a second visit.
Though that was my first direct experience with UU, I was
actually introduced to it a couple years earlier. As a college senior, I took
an environmental science course called Nature and Society. I had initially
assumed it would focus on ecology and other natural sciences, but I soon
realized that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, it focused on the relationship
among people, animals, and nature. The natural sciences, the professor argued,
are an important perspective through which to consider this relationship, but
so are the social sciences and humanities. Indeed, one of the key takeaways
from the course was an ethical concept called the Circle of Moral Community.
Before I describe what my professor meant by this concept, I’d like you to
think of a few words that come to mind when you hear that phrase—the Circle of Moral Community—and, if you’re
willing, text them in. Again, text in the code on the
screen, followed by your response, to the number on the screen. (Read some of
the responses out loud.) Now, if you would like to call out a response, please
do so. (Repeat responses as they’re called out.)
According to my professor, the Circle of Moral Community is
a metaphorical circle enclosing every being a community, society, or individual
considers to have moral value; in other words, it’s a group including all
beings considered to have inherent worth and dignity. People, animals, and
nature can all be included in this group, but they can also be excluded from
it. In the nineteenth century, for example, American society included white men
in its Circle, but excluded non-whites, women, and other marginalized human
groups as well as animals and nature. Today, our society includes many more once-marginalized groups
in its Circle, but it continues to exclude many others.
Now I said that this course introduced me to UU, and I
didn’t misspeak. That being said, my professor never spoke of UU directly.
Rather, he addressed the need to think critically about how we as individuals
and as members of society define our Circles. Implicitly, he also called for us
to redefine our Circles to include human and non-human beings who are currently excluded from
it, but shouldn’t be. To me, this call to draw our Circle wide is the heart of
UU. What else can Standing on the Side of Love mean but using our passion and
energy to draw our society’s Circle wide and hold it there against the forces
pulling it back as no-longer- marginalized beings rush in to join
us? To me, that’s exactly what UUs have been doing throughout our history, from
Theodore Parker and other abolitionists to Augusta Jane Chapin and other
suffragists to too many more people to list, including those of you in this
hall. Please take a moment to think of how you have worked to draw our Circle
of Moral Community wide, and consider texting in to share your work with the
rest of us. Again, text in the code on the screen, followed by your response,
to the number on the screen. (Read some of the responses out loud.) Now, if you
would like to call out a response, please do so. (Repeat responses as they’re
called out.)
Personally, I believe I can best honor the UU tradition of
drawing the Circle of Moral Community wide by drawing it wider still. As a
young adult and new UU, my work is still in its infancy. However, I would like
to take a few minutes to share it with you in the hope that you might offer me
your guidance and support, and perhaps even join me in it. Think back to the
quotation by John Muir I read earlier in the service—“When we try to pick out anything by itself,
we find that it is bound fast by a thousand invisible cords that cannot be
broken to everything in the universe.” Think back to the video, “How Wolves
Change Rivers,” we watched after that. To me, that quotation and that video
epitomize the Seventh Principle of UU: “Respect for the interdependent web of all
existence of which we are a part.” This Principle has much to teach us about
how to coexist with animals and nature. As the video showed us, living
according to it can lead to flourishing species, communities, and ecosystems,
all of which can promote human flourishing, too.
As much as the Seventh Principle may help us draw our
Circle wide enough to include non- human beings, some UUs, including me,
believe that it alone is not enough. Almost two decades after the
reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park, wolf reintroduction in
the Northern Rocky Mountains has been successful enough that the gray wolf has
been federally delisted as an endangered species. However, many scientists
have argued that the delisting decision was based more on political values than
on sound science, as many states’ responses to it suggest. Last year, 473 of
Idaho’s wolves were killed by people through inhumane methods like aerial
hunting and leg-hold trapping with little, if any,
justification. Twenty-three more were killed during Michigan’s
first wolf hunt in almost fifty years, again with little justification. These
people could have peacefully coexisted with these wolves, but they chose not
to. After all, why would they have? Their Circles clearly don’t include wolves.
Somewhat surprisingly, this inhumane, unjustified killing is not in direct
opposition to the Seventh Principle, which calls us to respect the web of all
existence, but not necessarily the individual beings comprising it. So long as
we “harvest” wolves within their “sustainable yield,” as inhumane and
unjustified as this killing may be, we will not necessarily harm their and our
ecosystems.
The UU Animal Ministry, of which I am a member, is a group
of UUs committed to drawing our Circle wide enough to include individual
animals as well as natural systems. Through our First Principle Project, we aim
to promote critical discussion among UU congregations about how we might
respond to animal issues like, but certainly not limited to, the recent wolf
hunts. The Project takes its name from our goal to change the First Principle
from “The inherent worth and dignity of every person” to “The inherent worth
and dignity of every being.” We fully understand that our proposed change is
controversial. To many UUs, the First Principle represents a victory for human
rights and the culmination of a lifetime of work, and changing it would lessen
this victory and work. However, we believe that, rather than lessening the
First Principle, the change would honor the extent to which it has drawn our
Circle wide by drawing it wider still.
I’m committed to drawing our Circle wide by promoting the
First Principle Project and the UU Animal Ministry at UUCGL. If you’re
interested in joining me, I would greatly appreciate your support. Even if you
disagree with the Project’s goal or the way in which the UUAM is trying to
accomplish it, I would appreciate your feedback, too. As much as our goal may
be to change the First Principle, it is also to promote critical discussion of
such a change.
So, that’s my future work, and I’d greatly appreciate your
support in it. However, I’d also like to support you in your future work. You’ve
already shared how you’ve worked to draw our Circle of Moral Community wide.
Now, I’d like you to think of how you can draw it wider still, and, if you’re
willing, text in one last time. Again, text in the code on the screen, followed
by your response, to the number on the screen. (Read some of the responses out
loud.) Now, if you would like to call out a response, please do so. (Repeat
responses as they’re called out.)
Thank you very much for your time, attention, and
willingness to share. And thank you for drawing the circle wide and for your
commitment to draw it wider still.
