Conversation
between Jim Key, UUA Moderator
and
Rev. LoraKim Joyner
September
17, 2014
"This
topic is worthy of debate." - Jim Key, UUA Moderator
Many
thanks to Jim Key for taking the time and being present to the worthiness of the
democratic process in our association of congregations!
Seeking
clarification of the UUA bylaws, I spoke
with Jim Key for about 45 minutes last week.
He was quite helpful for understanding the process of seeking a change
to the First Principle.
Because
the Principles are a "C" bylaw, they come under special process that
is meant to seriously and deeply engage the breadth of Unitarian
Universalism. Any resolution that comes
to the General Assembly (the body that approves bylaw changes) therefore goes
through a specific process.
1. It is placed on the General Assembly Business
Agenda by February 1 of the year of the General Assembly. This can happen by
the UUA Board of Trustees, the Commission of Appraisal, 1 District, or 15
congregations. All 15 congregations must
pass the same resolution.
2.
Once it is on the Agenda, the Board of Trustees works closely with the sponsors
of the bylaw amendment resolution, in this case, the congregations that passed
the resolution, and the sponsors and collaboratory team of the First Principle
Project. Their aim is to prepare
Unitarian Universalists for the upcoming vote.
3.
At the General Assembly there is a mini-assembly before the vote takes place.
At this time the wording of the bylaw can be changed, but not substantively.
This means that the wording can be rephrased within the First Principle, but
probably no changes to other Principles will be allowed.
4.
After the mini-assembly the reworded resolution comes to a vote. The first vote
is not to pass the bylaw amendment, but to determine, by simple majority,
whether to assign the essence of the bylaw change to a study commission (not to
last longer than 2 years). At this point, delegates do not discuss which
changes to make, but basically are saying by a positive vote that the topic is
worthy of study, reflection, and discussion.
Jim Key feels that it is likely that the vote to refer this to a study
commission would pass, as he said, "This topic is worthy of debate."
(It is possible at this same
General Assembly that a delegate could call for a second vote seeking to pass
the bylaw resolution, and forgo the study commission. This takes an 80%
majority, and Jim Key said this is unlikely to pass, as would any issue at this
stage of study)
5. After this vote, it is up to the UUA Board to
appoint the members of the study commission.
In the words of Jim Key, he would want the study commission "to go
to a group of people to study it who understood the process and had people on
it who wanted it to pass."
6.
After 1-2 years, the study commission comes back with a resolution. They may choose to change the First Principle
with the exact words or different wording, or might suggest changes to other
Principles or even adding Principles.
They are guided by the essence of original resolution.
7.
Their resolution first goes to a mini-assembly where it can be changed, and
then to the floor for a 2/3rd's vote. If it passes, it comes up again for
another 2/3rd vote at the following GA before it becomes permanent.
The
highlights of this conversation for me are these:
1.
We have true collaboration with the UUA
Board of Trustees in this process.
2. At this point congregations need not worry
about the final wording of any change to the Principles. True, the exact wording is worthy ofdiscussion because it helps us understand one another and our world, and we need to be mindful of holding
discussions that deepen our relationships and broaden our ability to care for
one another.
3.
Basically, by passing the bylaw amendment resolution in a congregation, the
congregation is saying that the issue is worthy of study, discussion, and
reflection. Only after serious time and
deepening, and wider engagement, will we as a body know how to put into our
institutional practices the essence of the suggested change to the First
Principle.
4.
This is good news! We can get this more
easily on the General Assembly Agenda knowing that the final wording will be
worked out slowly and broadly over time.
I
am asking for discussion now on the following:
1.
What do you make of the strategy to pass this resolution in your congregation
knowing that it will most likely go to a study commission?
2. Do you think now is the time to discuss any
possible changes to the proposed amendment, or shall we wait until it gets
placed on the General Assembly Agenda?
3.
If you were to consider other words or actions that reflect the essence of the
change, what would you suggest? Some suggest using different words in the First
Principle, changing the Seventh Principle, or adding an additional Principle.
You
can place your comments in the comment section of this blog, and also submit a
reflection piece to me and I can post it here. I am specifically asking several
others to submit a blog that addresses how
they would move forward so that we can incorporate their wisdom and experiences
into how we as individuals and congregations engage, as well as the First
Principle Project Collaboratory Team.
Make
it so and thank you for your engagement!
In
hope of all beings,
Rev. LoraKim Joyner, DVM
First
Project Facilitator
Here
is the proposed bylaw amendment resolution each congregation will pass:
We the (insert congregation name) do hereby call on the
General Assembly of the UUA to omit "every person" and replace with
"every being" in Article II Principles and Purposes,
Section c-2.1 Principles, Line 12, UUA bylaws.
So
far we have 3 congregations that have passed it, and 4 sponsoring
organizations:
CUUPS
(Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans)
UU
Buddhist Fellowship
PACE
(Presidential Advisory Committee on Ethical Eating)
UUAM
(Unitarian Universalist Animal Ministry)